Wetenschappelijke evidentie

Onderzoek naar psychoanalyse algemeen

Gullestad, S.E., Stänicke, E., Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2024): Introduction: in search of change. In: Gullestad, S.E., Stänicke, E., Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (eds.), Psychoanalytic Studies of Change. An Integrative Perspective. London: Routledge,1-7.

Harari, E., Grant, D.C. (2022). Clinical wisdom, science and evidence: the neglegted gifts of psychodynamic thinking. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 1-9.

Woll, C.F.J., Schönbrodt, F.D. (2020). A Series of Meta-Analytic Tests of the Efficacy of Long-Term Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy. European Psychologist (2020), 25(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000385

Cornelius, J.T. (2018) The Case for Psychoanalysis, Exploring the Scientific Evidence. In: Barsness, R. E. (Ed.). (2017). Core competencies of relational psychoanalysis: a guide to practice, study, and research. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 

Solms, M. (2018). The scientific standing of psychoanalysis. BJPsych International 15(01):5-8

Draijer, N., Langeland, W. (2017). Psychoanalyse, psychoanalytische psychotherapie en wetenschappelijke evidentie. Tijdschrift voor Psychotherapie Uitgave 1/2017

Sandell, R. (2012). Research on Outcome of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalysis-derived Psychotherapies. In: Gabbard, G.O., Litowitz, B.E., Williams, P. (2012). Textbook of Psychoanalysis, 2nd edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Ablon, S., Smith-Hansen, L., Levy, R. (2012). Psychoanalytic Process Research. In: Gabbard, G.O., Litowitz, B.E., Williams, P. (2012). Textbook of Psychoanalysis, 2nd edition. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Jonghe, F., Maat, S. de, Van, R. Reekum, A. van, Draijer, N., Zevalkink, J. & Wolf, T. de (2010). De werkzaamheid van Langdurige Psychoanalytische Behandelingen. Hoofdstuk 10 in: Jonghe F. et al. (2010). Leidraad Langdurige psychoanalytische behandelingen. Amsterdam: Garant.

Shedler, J. (2010). The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy. American Psychologist, Vol. 65, No. 2, pages 98–109; February/March 2010.

Galatzer-Levy, R.M., Bachrach, H., Skolnikoff, A., Waldron, S., (2000). Does Psychoanalysis Work? New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

Nederlandstalig overzicht

Factsheet Psychodynamische psychotherapie (waaronder psychoanalyse) van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Psychotherapie (NVP). Psychodynamische psychotherapie bij volwassenen. Stand van wetenschap en praktijk: nvp_factsheet 2019 psychodynamische psychotherapie def-31ba09a1-9687-40f8-ac10-3c1599582854.pdf

Tijdschrift voor psychoanalyse en haar toepassing. Themanummer: Onderzoek. Jaargang 25 (2019), nummer 1.

Psychoanalytische deelonderwerpen

Het onbewuste

Weinberger, J., Stoycheva, V. (2020). The Unconscious. Theory, research, and clinical implication. New York: Guilford Press.

Mancia, M. (2006). Implicit memory and early unrepressed unconscious: their role in the therapeutic process (How the neuroscience can contribute to psychoanalysis). International Journal of Psychoanalysis87, 83-103.

Westen, D. (1999). The scientific status of unconscious processes: is Freud really dead? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association47, 1247-1267.

Dromen:

Ambresin, G., Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2024): Changes in dreams. an indicator for transformation processes in psychoanalysis: clinical outcome and process research in the MODE study. In: Gullestad, S.E., Stänicke, E., Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (eds.), Psychoanalytic Studies of Change. An Integrative Perspective. London: Routledge, 39-52.

Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Donié, M., Wichelmann, J., Ambresin, G., & Fischmann, T. (2023). Changes in dreams – the development of a dream-transformation scale in psychoanalyses with chronically depressed, early traumatized patients. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 46:1-2, 82-93. doi:10.1080/01062301.2023.2297116.

Fonagy, P.; Kächele, H.; Leuzinger-Bohleber, M.; Taylor, D. (eds.) (2012): The significance of dreams: Bridging clinical and extraclinical research in psychoanalysis. (Developments in psychoanalysis series). London: Karnac Books


Overdracht

Marmarosh, C. L. (2012). Empirically supported perspectives on transference. Psychotherapy, 49(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028801

Levy, K.N., et al. (2011). The relation between attachment status and the perception of transference: An empirical study.

Gabbard, G.O. (2006). Neuroscientific Perspectives on Transference. Psychiatric Annals Preview publication details; Thorofare Vol. 36, Iss. 4, (Apr 2006): 282-288.

Høglend, P., et al. (2006). The effect of transference interpretations in the context of therapeutic alliance and quality of object relations. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Oct;79(5):697-706.

Berk, M.S. & Andersen, S.M. (2000). The impact of past relationships on interpersonal behaviour: behavioural confirmation in the social-cognitive process of transference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79, 546-562.

Fonagy, P. (1999). Memory and therapeutic action. International Journal of Psychoanalysis80, 215-223.

Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). Understanding Transference: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10250-000

Pally, R. (1997). Memory: brain systems that link past, present and future. International Journal of Psychoanalysis78, 1223-1234.

Tegenoverdracht (als werkzaam mechanisme)

Van, H.L.R. (2019). Waarom werkt psychotherapie? Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 21, .pii: D3572.


Afweermechanismen

Giuseppe, M.D., Perry, J.C. (2021). The Hierarchy of Defense Mechanisms: Assessing Defensive Functioning With the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales Q-Sort. Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 15;12:718440.

Cramer, P. (2006). Protecting the Self. Defense Mechanisms in Action. New York: Guilford Press.

Vaillant, G.E. (1992). Ego Mechanisms of Defense. A guide for clinicians and researchers. Washington DC: America Psychiatric Press.


Gehechtheid

Cassidy, J., Shaver, P. (2018). Handbook of attachment. Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. New York: Guilford Press.

Fonagy, P. & Target, M. (2007). The rooting of the mind in the body: new links between attachment theory and psychoanalytic thought. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association55, 411-456.


Neurobiologische onderbouwing

Solms, M. (2018). The Neurobiological Underpinnings of Psychoanalytic Theory and Therapy. Front. Behav. Neurosci., 04 December 2018

Westen, D. & Gabbard, G.O. (2002). Developments in cognitive neuroscience: implications for theories of transference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association50, 99-134.


Diagnostiek (het alternatief voor de DSM, sterk empirisch onderbouwd)

Lingiardi, V., McWilliams, N. (ed.) (2017). Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual. Second Edition. New York: Guilford Press.


Diagnostiek (empirisch bewijs tegen de wetenschappelijke evidentie van de DSM en voor een psychoanalytisch alternatief).

Vanheule, S. (2015). Psychodiagnostiek anders bekeken: kritieken op de DSM. Een pleidooi voor functiegerichte diagnostiek. Leuven: Lannoo Campus.


Weerstand

Dam, Q.D., van (2006). Weerstand in de psychoanalyse. Een empirisch begripsonderzoek onder Nederlandse psychoanalytici. Assen: Van Gorcum.

Empathie

Strien, A.P.M. (1999). Empathie. Een kwaliteitsaspect van de psychoanalytische praktijk? Een exploratief onderzoek van een concept. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.


Over psychoanalytisch onderzoek

Altmann de Litvan, M. (2022). Clinical Research in Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.

Shedler, J. (2017). Where Is the Evidence for “Evidence-Based” Therapy? Journal of Psychological Therapies in Primary Care 2015;4:47–59.

Hinselwood, R.D. (2013). Research on the Couch. London: Routledge.

Sandler, J., Sandler, A., Davies, R. (2000). Clinical and Observational Psychoanalytic Research: Roots of a Controversy. London: Karnac Books.

 

Omdat onderzoek middels de methode van de Randomiszed Controlled Trial zich niet goed leent voor uitkomstonderzoek naar psychoanalyse, zijn psychoanalytische deeltheorieën en daarbij passende psychoanalytische psychotherapieën wel onderzocht in RCT’s. Voor een overzicht:

Summers, R.G., & Barber, J.P. (2010). Psychodynamic therapy: A guide to evidence-based practice. New York: Guilford Press.

Weiner, I.B., & Bornstein, R.F. (2009). Principles of psychotherapy: Promoting evidence-based psychodynamic practice. New York: Wiley.

Levy, R.A., Ablon, J.S., (2009). Handbook of Evidence-Based Psychodynamic Psychotherapy. Bridging the gap between science and practice. New York: Humama Press.

Zie verder alle onderzoeken naar evidence-based psychoanalytische psychotherapieën, zoals TFP, MBT, AFT, DIT, KPSP en ISTDP.